• Both are enterprise content management systems.
• Both are part of CMS Focus

• Tiki is community open source while Magnolia is single-vendor commercial open source. Thus, Magnolia has a "community" version and an "enterprise" version.
  • Most of the committers here work for Magnolia, whereas in Tiki contributions come from various organizations
• Alfresco is written in Java whereas Tiki is written in PHP.
• Tiki hosting requirements are easier (shared hosting)
• Tiki dogfoods its own wiki where as Magnolia uses Confluence, a commercial wiki engine
• Tiki has more built-in features, well, because Tiki is the FLOSS Web Application with the most built-in features
  • In Tiki, you get all these features built-in and as Open Source, whereas in Magnolia, some features you could want, like a Mobile version, "you need a Enterprise Edition of Magnolia"

http://www.cmsmatch.com/compare/content-management-systems/695+1073

Compare them at http://cmsmatrix.org

Number of contributors who made changes to the project source code each month.

Number of commits made to the project source code each month.

• http://www.ohloh.net/p/compare?project_0=Magnolia+CMS&project_1=Tiki+Wiki+CMS+Groupware

• Magnolia
• TikiWiki vs Magnolia