Features / Usability

Posted by Thomas Despoix 15 Nov 2007 10:35 GMT-0000 posts: 54

> I think the explanation for that — and sorry for the nasty surprise btw — is that Tiki's raison d'etre is, or was originally, more in the area of community collaboration/communication, where SEF links are not as important as they are for sites for which good search returns are a priority. That said, the Tiki sites I'm involved with haven't had any particular problem showing up pretty well in searches, I guess due to site content more than technical details.

I can understand that, here are a few comments though :

• Why would an .htaccess file to understand SEF links be provided if the portal could not produce any?
• SEF links are actually more readable and much easier to manipulate even for humans!
• Serch engines optimisation is based on both content (mandatory ❗ and technical details. I really believe both approaches are complementary

I'm a bit disappointed (frustrated actally) by the lack of such a standard feature... 🙁

Anyway, thanks for your feedback.